Intel Arc Graphics 140T analysis – Arrow Lake-H iGPU gains frame generation support – Notebookcheck.net
Source: Notebookcheck.net
Intel has just launched its latest Arrow Lake mobile processors (Core Ultra 200 series), and we’ve already had the opportunity to put the H-series CPUs through a detailed test. Alongside the CPU improvements, the integrated Arc Graphics 140T and Arc Graphics 130T have received a significant upgrade.In this article, we analyze the technology and performance of these new iGPUs, comparing them to Intel’s own Lunar Lake graphics, AMD’s Zen 5 iGPUs, and the latest ARM GPUs from Apple and Qualcomm.
The two new integrated graphics solutions, Intel Arc Graphics 140T and 130T, are technically quite different from the Lunar Lake iGPUs (Arc Graphics 140V/130V). While Lunar Lake GPUs feature second-generation XeSS cores, the Arrow Lake iGPUs are enhanced versions of the Arc Graphics from the Meteor Lake generation. They still utilize first-generation Xe cores, but with notable improvements.
Like the Lunar Lake iGPUs, the new Arc Graphics 140T and 130T now incorporate XMX engines, significantly boosting AI performance to 77 TOPS. Additionally, ray tracing capabilities have been doubled, with the number of ray tracing units increasing to 8, and the L2 cache expanding to 8 MB.Each Xe core still features 16 Xe vector engines and maintains full support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shading.
At the end of last year, Intel introduced the second generation of its Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) technology, which now includes several new features. These enhancements include Super Resolution (XeSS-SR), Frame Generation (XeSS-FG), and Low Latency (XeLL).Currently, all games that support XeSS 2—though still limited in number—fully integrate all three of these new features.
The new Arrow Lake-H GPUs fully support XeSS 2, including all its features, but the same applies to Lunar Lake models. Older iGPUs also offer XeSS 2 support, though not all features are available on those architectures.The following table provides an overview of different GPU generations and their respective XeSS 2 capabilities.
The two test notebooks are the Asus Zenbook Duo and the MSI Prestige 16 AI, both equipped with the Core Ultra 9 285H and the fastest version of the Intel Arc Graphics 140T.These devices feature different power implementations, affecting performance. In the Zenbook Duo, the processor peaks at 60 watts but stabilizes at 24 watts under sustained load. In contrast, the Prestige 16 briefly reaches 115 watts before quickly settling at 45 watts.Both laptops are equipped with 32GB of LPDDR5x RAM (7467 or 7500 MHz), and the maximum core clock of the Arc Graphics 140T is 2.25 GHz.We will also be adding benchmark results for the Arc Graphics 130T soon.
To ensure a meaningful comparison between the different graphics cards, we analyze power consumption alongside synthetic benchmark performance to determine overall efficiency.All power consumption measurements are conducted using an external device to eliminate variations caused by internal factors. However, we measure total system consumption, not just raw TDP values, to provide a more comprehensive performance assessment.
Now, let’s move on to performance, starting with synthetic benchmarks. It is clear that the Arc Graphics 140T performs at a level similar to high-end implementations of the Lunar Lake Arc Graphics 140V, occasionally holding a slight advantage. Intel claims a 20% performance improvement over the Meteor Lake Arc Graphics, and our tests confirm this on average.This means the Arc Graphics 140T outperforms AMD’s Radeon 880M and Radeon 890M iGPUs. However, dedicated GPUs such as the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop, and Radeon RX 6550M still hold a clear performance advantage.For ARM GPU comparisons, we focus on Steel Nomad tests in 3DMark, as they run natively on ARM systems. The Arc Graphics 140T is 40-50% faster than the Adreno X1-85 (4.6 TFLOPS variant), although this higher-end model is rarely found on the market. The more widely available X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS) trails further behind, with the Arc Graphics 140T leading by around 70%.Against Apple’s M4 generation, the Arc Graphics 140T narrowly looses to the standard M4 GPU (-7%) and falls significantly behind the lowest M4 Pro GPU, which is over 80% faster.
In Geekbench’s OpenCL test, the Arc Graphics 140V performs on par with the Radeon 890M and well ahead of the Arc Graphics 140V, which surprisingly lags slightly behind even the older Meteor Lake Arc Graphics. Snapdragon GPUs are clearly outperformed, and while the M4 GPU is just edged out, the M4 Pro remains far ahead. In the Vulkan test, the two latest Intel iGPUs are almost evenly matched.In GFXBench OpenGL tests, the Arc Graphics 140T only narrowly outperforms the older Arc Graphics, while the Lunar Lake Arc Graphics 140V falls further behind. AMD’s Radeon iGPUs are also surpassed, but the Adreno X1-85 holds a slight performance edge over the 140T. Meanwhile, Apple’s M3 and M4 GPUs remain significantly faster across the board
Read more: Click here